課程資訊
課程名稱
 專題研究：公民不服從的權利取向
Independent Study: Rights-Based Approach of Civil Disobedience 
開課學期
 107-2 
授課對象
 文學院  哲學研究所  
授課教師
 吳澤玫 
課號
 Phl7874 
課程識別碼
 124 M6030 
班次
  
學分
 1.0 
全/半年
 半年 
必/選修
 選修 
上課時間
 星期三6(13:20~14:10) 
上課地點
 哲研討室三 
備註
 本課程中文授課,使用英文教科書。請先徵得授課教師及申請者同意後,始得選課。
限碩士班以上
總人數上限：5人 
Ceiba 課程網頁
 http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1072RightsCD 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
 核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

在當代政治哲學的研究裡，關於為什麼應該保障公民不服從，主要的理據包括權利取向和證成取向這兩類觀點。權利取向主張有從事公民不服從的權利。然而，這是什麼樣的權利？支持有這種權利的根據為何？其範圍與限制為何？這些都是值得進一步探究的問題。本課程聚焦於公民不服從的權利取向，將透過閱讀相關理論和學者之間的爭論，深入瞭解並評估這種觀點的合理性和可行性。 

課程目標
 1.瞭解公民不服從在當代政治哲學的討論
2.瞭解公民不服從的權利取向之相關論證與批評
3.將本課程所學結合到自身的研究當中 
課程要求
 1.課前閱讀：每週需預先仔細閱讀指定閱讀文本，撰寫論點摘要與心得，以充分掌握相關論點之問題意識與理論主張。
2.課堂討論：針對文本內容、論證主張、疑惑不解之處或延伸問題進行討論。
3.期末報告：針對本課程之授課內容，自選研究主題，撰寫個人報告。 
預期每週課後學習時數
  
Office Hours
 每週四 11:00~13:00 
指定閱讀
 1.Leif Wenar, “Rights,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2015 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = .
2.Joseph Raz, “A Right to Dissent? I. Civil Disobedience,” in Joseph Raz, The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979. Pp. 262-275.
3.David Lefkowitz, “The Duty ot Obey the Law,” Philosophy Compass 1, 6 (2006): 571-598.
4.David Lefkowitz, “On a Moral Right to Civil Disobedience,” Ethics 117 (2007): 202–233.
5.David Lefkowitz, “In Defense of Penalizing (but not Punishing) Civil Disobedience,” Res Publica 24 (2017): 273-289.
6.Kimberley Brownlee, “Penalizing Public Disobedience,” Ethics 118 (2008): 711-716.
7.Kimberley Brownlee, “Reply to Critics,” Criminal Law and Philosophy 10, 4 (2016):721-739.
8.Kimberley Brownlee, “Two Tales of Civil Disobedience: A Reply to David Lefkowitz,” Res Publica 24 (2018): 291–296.
9.Ronald Dworkin, “Ch8. Civil Disobedience,” in Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978. Pp.206-222.
10.William Smith, “Civil Disobedience and the Public Sphere,” The Journal of Political Philosophy 19, 2 (2011): 145-466.
11.William Smith, “Chapter 4. Civil Disobedience as a moral right,” in Civil Disobedience and Deliberative Democracy. London; New York: Routledge, 2013. Pp. 84-108.
12.William Smith, “The Burdens of Conviction: Brownlee on Civil Disobedience,” Criminal Law and Philosophy 10, 4 (2016): 693-706.
13.Candice Delmas, A Duty to Resist: When Disobedience Should Be Uncivil. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.
14.Tine Hindkjaer Madsen, “On a Belief-Relative Moral Right to Civil Disobedience,” Res Publica. (2018): 1-17. (forthcoming). Advance online publication. doi: 110.1007/s11158-018-9404-7 
參考書目
 1.陳弘儒，〈論兩種不服從的保障方式：對於「證立取向」與「權利取向」的概念初探〉，《政治與社會評論》第62期 (2017): 127-186.
2.Alejandra Mancilla, “Noncivil Disobedience and the Right of Necessity. A Point of Convergence,” Krisis 3 (2012): 3-15.
3.Candice Delmas, “Politcal Resistance: A matter of Fairness,” Law and Philosophy 33, 4 (2014): 465-488.
4.Candice Delmas, “False Convictions and True Conscience,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 35, 2 (2015): 403-425.
5.Candice Delmas, “Civil Disobedience,” Philosophy Compass 11, 11 (2016): 681-691.
6.Simon Caney “Responding to Global Injustice: On the right of Resistance” Social Philosophy and Policy 32, 1 (2015):51-73.
7.David Lyons, “Moral Judgment, Historical Reality, and Civil Disobedience,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 27, 1 (1998): 31–49.
8.A. John Simmons, “Civil Disobedience and the Duty to Obey the Law,” in R. G. Frey and Christopher Heath Wellman eds., Blackwell Companion to Applied Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. Pp. 50-61.
9.Robin Celikates, “Rethinking Civil Disobedience as a Practice of Contestation—Beyond the Liberal Paradigm,” Constellations 23,1 (2016) :37-45.
10.Robin Celikates, “Democratizing civil disobedience,” Philosophy and Social Criticism 42,10 (2016): 982-944.
11.Daniel Markovits, “Democratic Disobedience,” Yale Law Journal 114 (2005): 1897–1952.
12.Kimberley Brownlee, Conscience and Conviction: The Case for Civil Disobedience. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
13.William Smith, “Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience,” Res Publica 10 (2004): 353-377. 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
  
No.
項目
百分比
說明
1. 
 指定閱讀之摘要與心得 
25% 
  
2. 
 課堂討論表現 
25% 
  
3. 
 期末報告 
50% 
  
 
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
 2/20  1.Leif Wenar, “Rights,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2015)
2.Joseph Raz, “A Right to Dissent? I. Civil Disobedience,” in The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. (1979). Pp. 262-275. 
第2週
 2/27  David Lefkowitz, “The Duty ot Obey the Law,” Philosophy Compass 1, 6 (2006): 571-598. 
第3週
 3/06  David Lefkowitz, “On a Moral Right to Civil Disobedience,” Ethics 117 (2007): 202–233. 
第4週
 3/13  1.Kimberley Brownlee, “Penalizing Public Disobedience,” Ethics 118 (2008): 711-716.
2.David Lefkowitz, “In Defense of Penalizing (but not Punishing) Civil Disobedience,” Res Publica 24 (2017): 273-289. 
第5週
 3/20  1.Ronald Dworkin, Taking Right Seriously. (1978). Chapter 8. Civil Disobedience. Pp. 206-222.
2.William Smith, “The Burdens of Conviction: Brownlee on Civil Disobedience,” Criminal Law and Philosophy 10, 4 (2016): 693-706. 
第6週
 3/27  1.Kimberley Brownlee, “Reply to Critics” Criminal Law and Philosophy 10, 4 (2016): 721-739.
2.Kimberley Brownlee, “Two Tales of Civil Disobedience: A Reply to David Lefkowitz,” Res Publica 24 (2018): 291–296. 
第7週
 4/03  William Smith, “Civil Disobedience and the Public Sphere,” The Journal of Political Philosophy 19, 2 (2011): 145-166. 
第8週
 4/10  William Smith, Civil Disobedience and Deliberative Democracy. (2013). Chapter 4. Civil Disobedience as a Moral Right. Pp. 84-108. 
第9週
 4/17  Candice Delmas, A Duty to Resist: When Disobedience Should Be Uncivil. (2018). Introduction: Political Obligation(s). Pp. 1-20. 
第10週
 4/24  Candice Delmas, A Duty to Resist: When Disobedience Should Be Uncivil. (2018). Chapter 1. Principled Disobedience. Pp. 21-46. 
第11週
 5/01  Candice Delmas, A Duty to Resist: When Disobedience Should Be Uncivil. (2018). Chapter 2. In Defense of Uncivil Disobedience. Pp.47-71. 
第12週
 5/08  Candice Delmas, A Duty to Resist: When Disobedience Should Be Uncivil. (2018). Chapter 3. Justice and Democracy. Pp. 72-107. 
第13週
 5/15  Candice Delmas, A Duty to Resist: When Disobedience Should Be Uncivil. (2018). Chapter 4. Fairness. Pp. 108-135. 
第14週
 5/22  Candice Delmas, A Duty to Resist: When Disobedience Should Be Uncivil. (2018). Chapter 5. Samaritanism. Pp. 136-167. 
第15週
 5/29  Candice Delmas, A Duty to Resist: When Disobedience Should Be Uncivil. (2018). Chapter 6. Political Association and Dignity. Pp. 168-197. 
第16週
 6/05  Candice Delmas, A Duty to Resist: When Disobedience Should Be Uncivil. (2018). Chapter 7. Acting on Political Obligations. Pp. 198-222. 
第17週
 6/12  Tine Hindkjaer Madsen, “On a Belief-Relative Moral Right to Civil Disobedience,” Res Publica (2018): 1-17. 
第18週
 6/19  期末綜合討論